The discipline of simplicity is not strictly about the stuff that we
have. This is one of the main
differences between understanding simplicity as a spiritual discipline, and
understanding it merely as a process of de-cluttering. Most of the sites you find on the internet
will deal with simplicity through this very narrowly defined dimension. Simplicity can be found, they argue, through
better organizational systems and moor floor-space in the house. This may do wonders to aid one in cleaning
the house, but it has little to do with a spiritual transformation.
The discipline of simplicity is not merely about our stuff. Living in a wilful attitude of single
hearted focus on God and His kingdom changes our focus away from the material
side of our life, and tunes us in deeper ways to the things of God. This allows us to own possessions, yet not be
owned by them. Our material wealth is
understood not as something inherently against our spiritual fulfilment, but
as a tool through which we can express God’s kingdom in our lives.
Yet simply seeing the material side of our life as a ‘tool’ for Kingdom
living is not enough. We can understand our possessions as tools, yet still
feel that we ‘own’ them. To understand
our possessions as belonging to us, as conveying some statement about our
ability, worth and status, does little to keep us focused on God’s
kingdom. We must be willing, in radical
obedience to the will of God, to release our self-focused hold over our possessions. The discipline of simplicity, as it relates
to the things we own, must be expressed in our willingness to give.
It was this attitude that created the dynamic community of believers
that we see in the book of Acts, chapter 4.
“Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul,
and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they
owned was held in common . . .There was not one needy person among them.” (Acts
4:32 & 34) In our modern day
materialistic world we like to dismiss this reality and suggest that the early
church really didn't engage in this type of kingdom living. We assume this is unrealistic, or worse yet,
unhealthy. After all, don’t Ananaias and
Sapphira turn their back on this reality in the very next passage? Surely this
must speak to the untenable reality of this type of giving! Yet to truly believe this is to suggest that
Jesus didn't understand the fullness of the Kingdom when he said “Whoever has
two coats must share with anyone who has none; and whoever has food must do
likewise.” (Luke 3:11) God’s kingdom is
a giving kingdom, and we are invited and encouraged to give. We give of ourselves, of our time, of our
possessions. Jesus calls us to ‘give without expecting return’ (Luke 6:35).
Giving of what we have, for the purpose of furthering the Kingdom of
God, stretches us beyond our comfortable reliance upon the stuff of this world.
It breaks the habits of consumption that we may so easily fall into. In stepping away from the faulty privatized
world of ‘ownership’ we enter into an active spirit of trust and reliance. In stretching ourselves to give, we open
ourselves to the reality of God’s provision and the freedom of being led by His
Spirit and His will. We also expose hidden
thoughts and presumptions regarding the matters of self-worth, status, acceptance,
and value.
So, find something to give. Avoid
relying on the items stored in the back of your closet, or in your basement –
items that are easy to give away because you will never miss them. This is simple de-cluttering, and not actual
giving. It is to give in a manner which
avoids any sense of personal cost. Yet
to truly give, to give in the way that God, in Christ, gave to us, we must give
of our self; our offering be as heartfelt as it is it tangible. Maybe give your favourite item of clothing,
or your favourite book. Give away your
second television, or a piece of furniture.
Give in a way that you will feel it and recognize the absence of what
you have given. Pay attention to the
emotions that surround your thoughts of giving.
Why are you reluctant to give something?
What does that reluctance say about a possible over-attachment to that
item? Do you experience a sense of
inward freedom when you give?